#8 week comment on Washington post.

I disagree with the writer, first , there are a lot of example that a law did not go through because of protest, the things that happened in South Kores was only a sepecial event, we can't judge this event by that, this event is related with million netizen, and obviously the bill is radiculous, not only netizen, I believe more and more people would come out and do protest, this is a democractic rights, and government would under too much pressure, I can't say it must work, but it could work in some situation.


commented by PeacemakerDav


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/post/hey-internet-wheres-the-outrage/2013/03/13/caf1f4b2-8c03-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_blog.html




This is horrible! U.S army should not be like this, I can't believe that it says that service members who are victims of sexual assault effectively don’t have the same rights as civilians, this means when someone was assaulted by a soldier, she must be silent, because of the commander. After 200 hundred years, U.S became a powerful country with thorough legal system, the civilians' rights are under protection. But the thing happend in U.S army, reflected that the legal system should be fixed again in military. A military is another name card of a country, it is now only show other countries the power of the country, but also can show the quality of the country.

And also I have to agree with the writer, I also wanna know why commander could be the only one people that make the decition about this kind of case.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/combatting-sexual-assault-in-the-military/2013/03/13/15e4c740-8c01-11e2-9f54-f3fdd70acad2_allComments.html?ctab=all_&wp_login_redirect=0